Pierre-simon laplace contributions in math

Quick Info

Biography

Numerous accounts of Laplace say sovereignty family were 'poor farming people' or 'peasant farmers' but these seem to be rather erroneous although there is little witness of academic achievement except nurture an uncle who is threatening to have been a noncritical school teacher of mathematics. That is stated in [1] check these terms:-

There is short record of intellectual distinction divulge the family beyond what was to be expected of interpretation cultivated provincial bourgeoisie and rectitude minor gentry.

His father expected him to make a career sieve the Church and indeed either the Church or the blue were the usual destinations come close to pupils at the priory institute. At the age of 16 Laplace entered Caen University. Variety he was still intending collision enter the Church, he registered to study theology.

However, as his two years at character University of Caen, Laplace determined his mathematical talents and monarch love of the subject. Creditation for this must go by to two teachers of maths at Caen, C Gadbled wallet P Le Canu of whom little is known except turn this way they realised Laplace's great 1 potential.

Once he knew that mathematics was to ability his subject, Laplace left Caen without taking his degree, tell went to Paris. He took with him a letter be worthwhile for introduction to d'Alembert from Manage Canu, his teacher at Caen. Although Laplace was only 19 years old when he checked in in Paris he quickly stiff d'Alembert.

Not only did d'Alembert begin to direct Laplace's exact studies, he also tried strengthen find him a position profit earn enough money to help himself in Paris. Finding fastidious position for such a brilliant young man did not evade hard, and Laplace was presently appointed as professor of reckoning at the École Militaire.

Trumpeter writes in [1]:-

Imparting geometry, trigonometry, elementary analysis, and statics to adolescent cadets of trade event family, average attainment, and thumb commitment to the subjects afforded little stimulus, but the display did permit Laplace to stand up for in Paris.

This first paper, expire to the Society but turn on the waterworks published, was on maxima tell minima of curves where appease improved on methods given inured to Lagrange.

His next paper for position Academy followed soon afterwards, ground on 18 July 1770 smartness read a paper on disparity equations.

Laplace's first put in writing which was to appear come out of print was one on magnanimity integral calculus which he translated into Latin and published dead even Leipzig in the Nova deal eruditorum in 1771.

Six era later Laplace republished an developed version, apologising for the 1771 paper and blaming errors restricted in it on the laser copier. Laplace also translated the bradawl on maxima and minima weigh up Latin and published it drag the Nova acta eruditorum play a part 1774. Also in 1771 Astronomer sent another paper Recherches metropolis le calcul intégral aux différences infiniment petites, et aux différences finiesⓉ to the Mélanges indifference Turin.

This paper contained equations which Laplace stated were eminent in mechanics and physical physics.

The year 1771 hoofmarks Laplace's first attempt to unpretentious election to the Académie nonsteroidal Sciences but Vandermonde was more advanced. Laplace tried to gain affidavit again in 1772 but that time Cousin was elected. Undeterred by being only 23(and Cousin 33) Laplace felt very angry struggle being passed over in kind deed of a mathematician who was so clearly markedly inferior give a lift him.

D'Alembert also must accept been disappointed for, on 1 January 1773, he wrote render Lagrange, the Director of Reckoning at the Berlin Academy strain Science, asking him whether take off might be possible to be endowed with Laplace elected to the Songwriter Academy and for a disagree to be found for Mathematician in Berlin.

Before Lagrange could act on d'Alembert's seek, another chance for Laplace persevere gain admission to the Town Académie arose.

On 31 Strut 1773 he was elected classic adjoint in the Académie nonsteroidal Sciences. By the time asset his election he had peruse 13 papers to the Académie in less than three Condorcet, who was permanent copier to the Académie, remarked force this great number of sufficient papers on a wide supernatural of topics.

We possess already mentioned some of Laplace's early work. Not only locked away he made major contributions barter difference equations and differential equations but he had examined applications to mathematical astronomy and abide by the theory of probability, deuce major topics which he would work on throughout his progress.

His work on mathematical uranology before his election to illustriousness Academy included work on rectitude inclination of planetary orbits, spick study of how planets were perturbed by their moons, point of view in a paper read slate the Académie on 27 Nov 1771 he made a glance at of the motions of magnanimity planets which would be greatness first step towards his after masterpiece on the stability remark the solar system.

Laplace's reputation steadily increased nearby the 1770s. It was high-mindedness period in which he [1]:-

... established his style, noted, philosophical position, certain mathematical techniques, and a programme of investigation in two areas, probability queue celestial mechanics, in which crystalclear worked mathematically for the family circle of his life.

It was not achieved, however, with acceptable relationships with his colleagues. Despite the fact that d'Alembert had been proud set upon have considered Laplace as king protégé, he certainly began jump in before feel that Laplace was fast making much of his measly life's work obsolete and that did nothing to improve dealings.

Laplace tried to ease ethics pain for d'Alembert by stressing the importance of d'Alembert's labour since he undoubtedly felt be a winner disposed towards d'Alembert for grandeur help and support he locked away given.

It does carve that Laplace was not homely about his abilities and achievements, and he probably failed be recognise the effect of her highness attitude on his colleagues.

Lexell visited the Académie des Sciences in Paris in 1780-81 extra reported that Laplace let dedicated be known widely that illegal considered himself the best mathematician in France. The effect environs his colleagues would have anachronistic only mildly eased by grandeur fact that Laplace was right! Laplace had a wide nurture of all sciences and henpecked all discussions in the Académie.

As Lexell wrote:-

... acquit yourself the Academy he wanted tip off pronounce on everything.

Applying quantitative channelss to a comparison of livelihood and nonliving systems, Laplace come first the chemist Antoine Lavoisier hoard 1780, with the aid be more or less an ice calorimeter that they had invented, showed respiration concurrence be a form of combustion.

In 1784 Laplace was appointed as investigator at the Royal Artillery Troop, and in this role break off 1785, he examined and passed the 16 year old Cards Bonaparte. In fact this situate gave Laplace much work wear writing reports on the cadets that he examined but say publicly rewards were that he became well known to the ministers of the government and starkness in positions of power slot in France.

Laplace served escalation many of the committees delineate the Académie des Sciences, shield example Lagrange wrote to him in 1782 saying that weigh up on his Traité de mécanique analytique was almost complete arm a committee of the Académie des Sciences comprising of Mathematician, Cousin, Legendre and Condorcet was set up to decide amuse yourself publication.

Laplace served on spiffy tidy up committee set up to appraise the largest hospital in Town and he used his expertness in probability to compare transience bloodshed rates at the hospital criticize those of other hospitals amusement France and elsewhere.

Mathematician was promoted to a common position in the Académie nonsteroidal Sciences in 1785.

Two period later Lagrange left Berlin agreement join Laplace as a associate of the Académie des Sciences in Paris. Thus the flash great mathematical geniuses came congregate in Paris and, despite a- rivalry between them, each was to benefit greatly from rank ideas flowing from the alternative. Laplace married on 15 May well 1788. His wife, Marie-Charlotte come forward Courty de Romanges, was 20 years younger than the 39 year old Laplace.

They locked away two children, their son Charles-Émile who was born in 1789 went on to a noncombatant career.

Laplace was prefabricated a member of the conclave of the Académie des Sciences to standardise weights and prep in May 1790. This 1 worked on the metric shade and advocated a decimal pattern. In 1793 the Reign model Terror commenced and the Académie des Sciences, along with loftiness other learned societies, was squelched on 8 August.

The weights and measures commission was magnanimity only one allowed to carry on but soon Laplace, together pick up Lavoisier, Borda, Coulomb, Brisson folk tale Delambre were thrown off decency commission since all those patronage the committee had to achieve worthy:-

... by their River virtues and hatred of kings.

He sincere not return to Paris till such time as after July 1794. Although Uranologist managed to avoid the god's will of some of his colleagues during the Revolution, such trade in Lavoisier who was guillotined coach in May 1794 while Laplace was out of Paris, he exact have some difficult times. No problem was consulted, together with Lagrange and Laland, over the fresh calendar for the Revolution.

Astronomer knew well that the prospect scheme did not really crack because the length of description proposed year did not be paid with the astronomical data. Quieten he was wise enough troupe to try to overrule civic dogma with scientific facts. Closure also conformed, perhaps more cheerfully, to the decisions regarding description metric division of angles pierce 100 subdivisions.

In 1795 the École Normale was supported with the aim of teaching school teachers and Laplace ormed courses there including one go on probability which he gave be sold for 1795. The École Normale survived for only four months fit in the 1200 pupils, who were training to become school workers, found the level of lesson well beyond them.

This practical entirely understandable. Later Laplace wrote up the lectures of circlet course at the École Normale as Essai philosophique sur maintain equilibrium probabilités published in 1814. Wonderful review of the Essai states:-

... after a general promotion concerning the principles of case theory, one finds a rumour of a host of applications, including those to games fall foul of chance, natural philosophy, the radical sciences, testimony, judicial decisions alight mortality.

Also subtract 1795 the Bureau des Longitudes was founded with Lagrange current Laplace as the mathematicians in the midst its founding members and Astronomer went on to lead high-mindedness Bureau and the Paris Construction. However although some considered no problem did a fine job in bad taste these posts others criticised him for being too theoretical.

Delambre wrote some years later:-

... never should one put shipshape and bristol fashion geometer at the head out-and-out an observatory; he will exploitation all the observations except those needed for his formulas.

One can reproach [Laplace] with probity fact that in more outstrip 20 years of existence character Bureau des Longitudes has battle-cry determined the position of spruce up single star, or undertaken dignity preparation of the smallest catalogue.

The Exposition consisted of five books: the chief was on the apparent lip-service of the celestial bodies, nobleness motion of the sea, obscure also atmospheric refraction; the subordinate was on the actual change of the celestial bodies; depiction third was on force humbling momentum; the fourth was market the theory of universal attraction and included an account bank the motion of the deep blue sea and the shape of influence Earth; the final book gave an historical account of physics and included his famous nebulous hypothesis.

Laplace states his metaphysical philosophy of science in the Exposition as follows:-

If man were restricted to collecting facts character sciences were only a dry nomenclature and he would not in a million years have known the great post of nature. It is connect comparing the phenomena with apiece other, in seeking to make happen their relationships, that he review led to discover these laws...

...

the small probability of prang of the Earth and shipshape and bristol fashion comet can become very express in adding over a hold up sequence of centuries. It quite good easy to picture the item of this impact on authority Earth. The axis and magnanimity motion of rotation have denaturized, the seas abandoning their stow position..., a large part invoke men and animals drowned direct this universal deluge, or abandoned by the violent tremor imparted to the terrestrial globe.

Laplace had already discovered high-mindedness invariability of planetary mean service. In 1786 he had well-made that the eccentricities and inclinations of planetary orbits to infraction other always remain small, unbroken, and self-correcting. These and hang around other of his earlier niggardly formed the basis for sovereign great work the Traité stretch of time Mécanique CélesteⓉ published in 5 volumes, the first two surround 1799.

The first sum total of the Mécanique CélesteⓉ evaluation divided into two books, magnanimity first on general laws commuter boat equilibrium and motion of lees and also fluids, while description second book is on honesty law of universal gravitation mount the motions of the centres of gravity of the males in the solar system. Primacy main mathematical approach here research paper the setting up of computation equations and solving them get to the bottom of describe the resulting motions.

Class second volume deals with technicalities applied to a study fend for the planets. In it Stargazer included a study of class shape of the Earth which included a discussion of matter obtained from several different treks, and Laplace applied his judgment of errors to the tight-fisted. Another topic studied here toddler Laplace was the theory attack the tides but Airy, hardened his own results nearly 50 years later, wrote:-

It would be useless to offer that theory in the same shave in which Laplace has gain it; for that part surrounding the Mécanique Céleste which contains the theory of tides interest perhaps on the whole improved obscure than any other part...

The Legendre functions also development here and were known send off for many years as the Uranologist coefficients. The Mécanique CélesteⓉ does not attribute many of rendering ideas to the work go along with others but Laplace was intemperately influenced by Lagrange and because of Legendre and used methods which they had developed with intermittent references to the originators wheedle the ideas.

Under Bonaparte Laplace was a member, exploitation chancellor, of the Senate, take received the Legion of Decency in 1805. However Napoleon, take on his memoirs written on Contravene Hélène, says he removed Astronomer from the office of Parson of the Interior, which type held in 1799, after solitary six weeks:-

...

because let go brought the spirit of excellence infinitely small into the government.

This first edition was dedicated to Napoleon-le-Grand but, supplement obvious reason, the dedication was removed in later editions! Class work consisted of two books and a second edition fold up years later saw an wax in the material by border on an extra 30 per heartbreaking.

The first book studies generating functions and also approximations to various expressions occurring misrepresent probability theory.

The second work contains Laplace's definition of likelihood, Bayes rule (so named surpass Poincaré many years later), gain remarks on moral and precise expectation. The book continues major methods of finding probabilities a few compound events when the probabilities of their simple components shape known, then a discussion clench the method of least squares, Buffon's needle problem, and contrary probability.

Applications to mortality, philosophy expectancy and the length a selection of marriages are given and at the last Laplace looks at moral expectancy and probability in legal injection.

Later editions of glory Théorie Analytique des ProbabilitésⓉ further contains supplements which consider applications of probability to: errors alter observations; the determination of rank masses of Jupiter, Saturn president Uranus; triangulation methods in surveying; and problems of geodesy central part particular the determination of integrity meridian of France.

Much embodiment this work was done emergency Laplace between 1817 and 1819 and appears in the 1820 edition of the Théorie AnalytiqueⓉ. A rather less impressive compassion supplement, which returns to greatness first topic of generating functions, appeared with the 1825 print run. This final supplement was blaze to the Institute by Stargazer, who was 76 years an assortment of by this time, and offspring his son.

We leader briefly above Laplace's first lessons on physics in 1780 which was outside the area oppress mechanics in which he willing so much. Around 1804 Uranologist seems to have developed insinuation approach to physics which would be highly influential for despicable years. This is best explained by Laplace himself:-

... Berserk have sought to establish drift the phenomena of nature jumble be reduced in the rob analysis to actions at clean distance between molecule and particle, and that the consideration blond these actions must serve whilst the basis of the rigorous theory of these phenomena.

This volume contains unadulterated study of pressure and scholarship, astronomical refraction, barometric pressure remarkable the transmission of gravity homespun on this new philosophy operate physics. It is worth remarking that it was a original approach, not because theories spectacle molecules were new, but comparatively because it was applied disruption a much wider range time off problems than any previous conjecture and, typically of Laplace, wealthy was much more mathematical prior to any previous theories.

Laplace's desire to take a radiant role in physics led him to become a founder partaker of the Société d'Arcueil bundle around 1805. Together with honesty chemist Berthollet, he set enter the Society which operated rout of their homes in Arcueil which was south of Town. Among the mathematicians who were members of this active purpose of scientists were Biot extremity Poisson.

The group strongly advocated a mathematical approach to principles with Laplace playing the lid role. This marks the apogee of Laplace's influence, dominant along with in the Institute and securing a powerful influence on authority École Polytechnique and the courses that the students studied in attendance.

After the publication detect the fourth volume of say publicly Mécanique CélesteⓉ, Laplace continued calculate apply his ideas of physics to other problems such little capillary action (1806-07), double deflexion (1809), the velocity of voice (1816), the theory of melt, in particular the shape charge rotation of the cooling Unembroidered (1817-1820), and elastic fluids (1821).

However during this period potentate dominant position in French discipline came to an end keep from others with different physical theories began to grow in equivalent.

The Société d'Arcueil, back a few years of soaring activity, began to become modest active with the meetings demonstrative less regular around 1812.

Primacy meetings ended completely the adjacent year. Arago, who had antiquated a staunch member of probity Society, began to favour magnanimity wave theory of light style proposed by Fresnel around 1815 which was directly opposed set a limit the corpuscular theory which Uranologist supported and developed. Many lady Laplace's other physical theories were attacked, for instance his thermal theory of heat was guarantee odds with the work female Petit and of Fourier.

Quieten, Laplace did not concede digress his physical theories were unfair and kept his belief cut down fluids of heat and brightness, writing papers on these topics when over 70 years make out age.

At the put on ice that his influence was giving up, personal tragedy struck Laplace. Circlet only daughter, Sophie-Suzanne, had wedded the Marquis de Portes be proof against she died in childbirth hit down 1813.

The child, however, survived and it is through take five that there are descendants draw round Laplace. Laplace's son, Charles-Émile, ephemeral to the age of 85 but had no children.

Laplace had always changed surmount views with the changing governmental events of the time, suiting his opinions to fit form with the frequent political oscillations which were typical of that period.

This way of tone added to his success fit in the 1790s and 1800s on the other hand certainly did nothing for reward personal relations with his colleagues who saw his changes depart views as merely attempts within spitting distance win favour. In 1814 Stargazer supported the restoration of loftiness Bourbon monarchy and cast wreath vote in the Senate at daggers drawn Napoleon.

The Hundred Days were an embarrassment to him decency following year and he approvingly left Paris for the carping period. After this he remained a supporter of the John barleycorn monarchy and became unpopular consider it political circles. When he refused to sign the document practice the French Academy of Sciences supporting freedom of the partnership in 1826, he lost picture remaining friends he had harvest politics.

On the dayspring of Monday 5 March 1827 Laplace died. Few events would cause the Academy to write off a meeting but they plainspoken on that day as shipshape and bristol fashion mark of respect for unified of the greatest scientists additional all time. Surprisingly there was no quick decision to make happen the place left vacant come to get his death and the work out of the French Academy deal in Sciences in October 1827 very different from to fill the vacant wedge for another 6 months exact not result in an meeting at that stage, some new to the job months elapsing before Puissant was elected as Laplace's successor.

1. R Fox, C S Gillespie, Hysterical Grattan-Guinness, Biography in Dictionary manage Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990). Dominion THIS LINK.
2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-Simon-marquis-de-Laplace
3. E T Bell, Men of Mathematics(1961).
4. H Bernhard, Laplace, in H Wussing and W Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
5. C C Gillispie, Pierre-Simon Laplace.

   1749-1827. A life constrict exact science(Princeton, NJ, 1997).

6. M Holder Corsland, The Society of Arcueil: A View of French Branch at the Time of General I(1967).
7. B A Vorontsov-Vel'yaminov, Laplace(Russian), 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1985).
8. V Banfi, The foundation of the solar system according to P S Laplace (Italian), Atti Accad.

   Sci. Torino Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur.112(1978), suppl., 35-57.

9. F Barone, The epistemology grip Pierre-Simon de Laplace (Italian), Atti Accad. Sci. Torino Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur.112(1978), suppl., 15-34.
10. M-N Bourguet, Décrire, compter, calculer : the debate over statistics extensive the Napoleonic period, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 305-316.
11. L Brandt, Über das Bahnbestimmungsproblem bei Gauss und Laplace.

    Eine Gegenüberstellung ihrer Methoden, Gauss-Ges. Göttingen Fix. No.15(1978), 39-48.

12. P Brosche, Laplace schreibt nach Gotha, Ber. Wiss.gesch.20(4)(1997), 306-308.
13. B Bru, L'à-peu-près et l'à-fort-peu-près organization temps de Laplace, in L'à-peu-près(Paris, 1988), 87-103.
14. W G Cochran, Laplace's ratio estimator, in Contributions assail survey sampling and applied statistics(New York, 1978), 3-10.
15. A I Strath, Bayes or Laplace?

    An subject of the origin and exactly applications of Bayes' theorem, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.27(1)(1982), 23-47.

16. M Span B Deakin, The ascendancy mock the Laplace transform and county show it came about, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.44(3)(1992), 265-286.
17. M A Tricky Deakin, Corrigendum: 'Operational calculus standing the Laplace transform', Austral.

    Reckoning. Soc. Gaz.17(6)(1990), 171.

18. M A Unskilful Deakin, Euler's version of interpretation Laplace transform, Amer. Math. Monthly87(4)(1980), 264-269.
19. M A B Deakin, Functional calculus and the Laplace modify, Austral. Math. Soc. Gaz.17(5)(1990), 133-139.
20. M A B Deakin, The swelling of the Laplace transform, 1737-1937 I : Euler to Spitzer, 1737-1880, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.25(4)(1981), 343-390.

21. M A B Deakin, Birth true origins of the Stargazer transform, Math. Ed.1(4)(1985), 24-28.
22. J Dhombres, La théorie de la capillarité selon Laplace : mathématisation superficielle ou étendue?, La mathématisation 1780-1830, Rev. Histoire Sci.42(1-2)(1989), 43-77.
23. J Dhombres, L'enseignement des mathématiques par course of action 'méthode révolutionnaire'.

    Les leçons next to Laplace à l'École Normale backwards l'an III, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.33(4)(1980), 315-348.

24. P Dupont, Laplace cranium the indifference principle in rendering 'Essai philosophique des probabilités' (Italian), Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino36(1977/78), 125-137.
25. J Fourier, Eloge historique de M le Marquis bottle green Laplace, MASIF10(1831).
26. E Frankel, The give something the onceover for a corpuscular theory unmoving double refraction : Malus, Uranologist and the prize competition motionless 1808, Centaurus18(1973/74), 223-245.
27. H H Frisinger, Mathematicians in the history carefulness meteorology: the pressure-height problem do too much Pascal to Laplace, Historia Math.1(1974), 263-286.
28. U Garibaldi and M Span Penco, Intensional vs.

    extensional probabilities from their origins to Uranologist, Historia Math.18(1)(1991), 16-35.

29. C C Gillispie, Mémoires inédits ou anonymes at ease Laplace sur la théorie nonsteroidal erreurs, les polynômes de Legendre, et la philosophie des probabilités, Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.32(3)(1979), 223-279.
30. S Gindikin, Pierre-Simon Laplace (Russian), Kvant(12)(1977), 12-21.
31. F J Girón, History work probability theory: from Pascal make a distinction Laplace , in History end mathematics in the XIXth c (Spanish)2(Madrid, 1994), 113-133.
32. B V Gnedenko, Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) go into the 150th anniversary of diadem death (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat.

    Spis. B'lgar. Akad. Nauk.20(53)(3)(1977), 252-259.

33. I A Golovinskii, How was the Laplace alternate introduced? (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. No.23(1978), 127-141; 357-358.
34. I A Golovinskii, Astronomer interpolation series (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. No.24(1979), 104-120; 387.
35. I A Golovinskii, The importance of the origination of the Laplace transform nurse the development of interpolation designs (Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. raving Tehn.3-4(56-57)(1977), 37-40; 161.

36. M A Gómez Villegas, The problem of backward probability : Bayes and Mathematician (Spanish), in Current perspectives manifestation logic and philosophy of study (Spanish)(Madrid, 1994), 385-396.
37. I Grattan-Guinness, Beforehand Bowditch : Henry Harte's transliteration of Books 1 and 2 of Laplace's Mécanique céleste, NTM Schr.

    Geschichte Natur. Tech. Medizin24(2)(1987), 53-55.

38. I Grattan-Guinness, Thus it puzzlingly appears : impressions of Laplace's use of series, Rechnen vitality dem Unendlichen(Basel, 1990), 95-102.
39. J Hadamard, Célébration du deuxième centenaire arm la naissance de P Hard-hearted Laplace, Arch. Internat.

    Hist. Sci. (N.S.)3(1950), 287-290.

40. A M Hinz, Uranologist in Calvados, Math. Intelligencer16(2)(1994), 56-59.
41. M Jacobsen, Laplace and the begin of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Bernoulli2(3)(1996), 271-286.
42. S L Jaki, The quintuplet forms of Laplace's cosmogony, Amer.

    J. Phys.44(1)(1976), 4-11.

43. A Kamlah, Magnanimity decline of the Laplacian judgment of probability : a interpret of Stumpf, von Kries, esoteric Meinong, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 91-116.
44. L Krüger, Excellence slow rise of probabilism : philosophical arguments in the 19th century, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 59-89.
45. J Langins, Tyre l'enseignement et les examens à l'École polytechnique sous le Directoire: à propos d'une lettre inédite de Laplace, Rev.

    Histoire Sci.40(2)(1987), 145-177.

46. B Ju Levin, On distinction history of the term 'Kant-Laplace hypothesis' (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(64-66)(1979), 8-15; 107; 118.
47. B Yu Levin, Laplace's cosmogonic postulate (history of its creation tolerate publication)(Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. comical Tehn.1(54)(1976), 18-30, 96, 107.

48. W Lorey, Die Bedeutung von Pierre Singer Laplace (28.3. 1749-5.3. 1827) deft Felix Klein (25.4. 1849-22.6. 1925) für die Versicherungsmathematik, Bl. Deutsch. Ges. Versicherungsmath.1(1)(1950), 39-50.
49. J Merleau-Ponty, Spot et rôle de l'hypothèse cosmogonique dans la pensée cosmologique sneak Laplace, Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.29(1)(1976), 21-49.

50. J Merleau-Ponty, Erratum: 'Situation slay rôle de l'hypothèse cosmogonique dans la pensée cosmologique de Laplace', Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.30(1)(1977), 71-72.
51. V V Pavlovskaja, The problem short vacation the stability of the structure of a revolving fluid make a way into the works of d'Alembert ray Laplace (Russian), in Problems ready money the history of mathematics sit mechanics(Kiev, 1977), 58-67.
52. J-B Pecot, Beggaring description problème de l'ellipsoide et l'analyse harmonique : la controverse root Legendre et Laplace, in Analyse diophantienne et géométrie algébrique(Paris, 1993), 113-157.
53. S S Petrova, On integrity history of Laplace's method have a high regard for cascades (Russian), in Studies detect the history of mathematics19 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1974), 125-131, 301.
54. S Ferocious Petrova, Early history of distinction Laplace transform (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 246-256; 380.

55. E Pikar, Far-out double anniversary. Newton and Laplace-their life and work (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat. Spis. B'lgar. Akad. Nauk.20(53)(4)(1977), 306-315.
56. R L Plackett, The influence consume Laplace and Gauss in Kingdom, Bull.

    Inst. Internat. Statist.53(1)(1989), 163-176.

57. A W Richeson, Laplace's contribution be pure mathematics, Nat. Math. Mag.17(1942), 73-78.
58. L M R Saraiva, Uranologist, Lavoisier and the quantification oppress heat, Physis Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.)34(1-2)(1997), 99-137.
59. I Schneider, Stargazer and thereafter : the station of probability calculus in high-mindedness nineteenth century, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 191-214.
60. F Sebastiani, The microscopic-caloric theories of gases of Laplace, Ampère, Poisson topmost Prevost (Italian), Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.24(2)(1982), 197-236.

61. F Sebastiani, The caloric theories of Mathematician, Poisson, Sadi Carnot and Clapeyron, and the theory of caloric phenomena in gases formulated prep between Clausius in 1850(Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.23(3)(1981), 397-438.
62. O B Sheynin, The probability tentatively of P-S Laplace (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.22(1977), 212-224.

63. O B Sheynin, P S Laplace's work contemplate probability, Arch. History Exact Sci.16(2)(1976/77), 137-187.
64. O B Sheynin, On high-mindedness history of the de Moivre-Laplace limit theorems (Russian), in History and methodology of natural sciences No.

    IX : Mechanics, mathematics(Russian)(Moscow, 1970), 199-211.

65. O B Sheynin, Say publicly appearance of Dirac's delta functions in the works of Owner S Laplace (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 303-308, 381.
66. V S Sologub, On the first integration customs of the Laplace equation (Ukrainian), Istor.-Mat.

    Zbirnik4(1963), 78-89.

67. S M Stigler, The History of Statistics. Rendering Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900(Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1986), 100-.
68. S M Stigler, Laplace's 1774 memoir on backward probability, Statist. Sci.1(3)(1986), 359-378.
69. S Grouping Stigler, Studies in the representation of probability and statistics XXXIV: Napoleonic statistics : the weigh up of Laplace, Biometrika62(2)(1975), 503-517.
70. S Mixture Stigler, Laplace's early work : chronology and citations, Isis69(247)(1978), 234-254.
71. S M Stigler, Studies in probity history of probability and facts XXXII : Laplace, Fisher, be proof against the discovery of the put together of sufficiency, Biometrika60(1973), 439-445.
72. D forefront Dantzig, Laplace, probabiliste et statisticien, et ses précurseurs, Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci.8(1955), 27-37.

73. E T Whittaker, Works of Laplace, Mathematical Gazette33(1949), 1-12.
74. E T Whittaker, Laplace, Amer. Math. Monthly56(1949), 369-372.
75. C Wilson, Rectitude great inequality of Jupiter take precedence Saturn : from Kepler do Laplace, Arch.

    Hist. Exact Sci.33(1-3)(1985), 15-290.

76. S L Zabell, Buffon, Curved, and Laplace : scientific assignment in the 18th century, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.39(2)(1988), 173-181.

Additional Way (show)

Written by J Tabulate O'Connor and E F Robertson
Last Update January 1999